





Created By
www.stephengraphics.com
Terms Of Use Statement Privacy Policy Purchase Agreement
DISCLAIMER: The information on this site is for educational purposes only and is
not intended to act as a substitute for medical advice provided by a qualified health
care provider, nor is any information on this site intended to diagnose, treat, cure
or prevent any disease.
FTC Disclosure: If you decide to purchase any products recommended
on this site I may possibly receive some commission.
If anyone has a specific health issue they should always
seek medical advice.
Please note this site may not display properly in the AOL browser

This testimony was made at the FDA meeting on Neurotoxicity of Mercury in teeth fillings,
Gaithersburg, Washington, USA September 5 -
"I make testimony and stand as a witness that I and my entire family of three
generations have been poisoned in many and various ways by dental mercury and other
dental metals, these family members include: both parents, myself, a female child
and a male child born to me respectively in 1969 and 1974.
I have conducted many
conventional metal tests on my family using proper scientific laboratories both before
and after amalgam removal. The results show overwhelming responses to the safe removal
of mercury teeth fillings both in data obtained and in clearance of symptoms.
My
own list of symptoms ran to two pages and included being bed-
Upon safe removal in May 1995 it took just three months
for my health to become normal and I returned to the land of the living, from the
land of the living dead.
This FDA meeting discusses only the neuroxicity of mercury.
tiredness, exhaustion, collapse, constant crying fits, memory loss, brainfog, severe
rhinitis, severe blocked nose, sinus polyps, word loss, lowered concentration, gazeing,
severe insomnia, irregular sleep patterns, hyperventilation, skin pallor, coldness,
lowered body temperature, leg cramps, irregular heartbeats, frozen shoulders, uncertain
gait.
I stress-
The effects on my life
were catastrophic and denied my family my abilities to nurture both the generation
behind me and the children coming up. As a divorced woman there was no-
From this newly acquired knowledge, I
had all mercury fillings safely removed and some months later each of the four gold
caps. After every dental removal session another batch of symptoms would depart much
to the astonishment of myself and friends / family.
From being a non-
I strongly
urge you to ban this vicious, insidious and poisonous metal from dental use in the
human mouth."
Angela Kilmartin,Patients Against Mercury Amalgam, London, UK
Here's what Angela
has to say about the meeting:-
I attended and testified at these immensely important
Hearings.
I must first give many thanks to the people who helped with my first PowerPoint
presentation, filming, easing my journey to Washington with localised arrangements,
tracing a museum for me and much support in many ways known to themselves.
A committee
of twenty independent professionals of high repute sat for the Federal Drugs Association
in a two-
Particular
mentions were given to the impact on the unborn foetus, pregnant women, those with
kidney disease and impaired immune response.
They acknowledged that Sweden is to
ban all mercury fillings as of January 2007, Norway, United Kingdom already have
Governmental 'Cautions' against placement of mercury fillings in place for these
groups of patients.
France, Germany, Holland and others have similar and additional
rules, for instance, in the transportation of mercury, toxic emissions from the teeth
of the dead during cremation, vaccine preservatives and fish
mercury-
The
current USA discussion ranges on catching up with European Directives and informing
the public on rapidly improving Composite filling choices now available.
Presenters
and testifiers ranged from the severely disabled to scientists on specific areas
of poisoning; to dentists and consumer advocates; national groups and representatives
from Norway, Sweden, England, America.
The committee was asked by the FDA on the
final afternoon to discuss and answer questions on dental mercury amalgam safety
put in writing in a White Paper for their deliberations.
On the two final questions
regarding the discussion of the White Paper, the committee voted in each case 13
NO to 7 Yes. This voting pattern refuted the White Paper studies put before them
for consideration as now
being outdated in knowledge, failing to move towards newer
studies and failing to observe the mountainous evidence of patients.
The committee
also discussed before the audience USA current status and recommendations on consumption
of fish because of mercury emittance levels, mercury removed from vaccines, prohibition
of mercury thermometers
and more. It seemed that the most serious cause of all mercury
injury, that in dentistry, had been insufficiently addressed.
In its voting, the
Hearing concluded that it was time to
"Take an historic step" to commence the removal
or banning of mercury fillings from the existing range of dental fillings now available,
most specifically for the above-
Meanwhile,
public sensitivity and knowledge about the dangers, both acute, chronic and aesthetic
values is outstripping dental moves. Patients have read or heard about the dangers
of mercury in dental amalgams and request white fillings, patients also don't want
a mouthful of black -
The anti-
Some
litigation and Congressional work is still in the pipeline and the committee was
influenced by the appearance of Congresswoman Watson and her strong testimony. She
received the only standing ovation of the day.
In summary: America is now starting
the long road to a complete ban on the use of dental mercury as a filling material
of choice, but patients are well-
Now see my book Autism, Amalgam and Me -